<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wine Reviews and News for Passionate Wine Lovers &#187; wine score</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewinebloggers.com/tag/wine-score/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewinebloggers.com</link>
	<description>The place for HIGH END WINE REVIEWS.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:24:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chateau Marjosse 2003, 86 points</title>
		<link>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/chateau-marjosse-2003-86-points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/chateau-marjosse-2003-86-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$0-30 wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Château Marjosse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red wine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine score]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewinebloggers.com/?p=1923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2003 Chateau Marjosse (France, Bordeaux, Bordeaux Controlee) Medium purple. The nose has some bubble gum, veggies and pepper. Little strange in the nose because I get a little industrial sweetness coming through.  The start on the palate is a little weak.  Not much happening and its a very soft wine.  Not much for tannins and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/chateau-marjosse-2003-86-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chateau Changyu-Castel Cabernet Germischt 2003, 88 points</title>
		<link>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/chateau-changyu-castel-2003-88-points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/chateau-changyu-castel-2003-88-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$0-30 wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chateau Changyu-Castel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red wine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red wine review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red wine score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine score]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewinebloggers.com/?p=978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2003 Chateau Changyu-Castel Co. Ltd Beiyujia vineyard, Shandong Province (China, Yantai) A friend suggested this China Cabernet Germischt. I questioned it at first, but I was surprised. The color is a bright ruby red. Nice Bordeaux nose of black pepper, green peppers and lettuce as well as some banana.  After 30 minutes opened up with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/chateau-changyu-castel-2003-88-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vina Requingua Cabernet Sauvignon Toro de Piedra 2003, 86 points</title>
		<link>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/vina-requingua-cabernet-sauvignon-toro-de-piedra-2003-86-points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/vina-requingua-cabernet-sauvignon-toro-de-piedra-2003-86-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$0-30 wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dry Wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red wine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red wine review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vina Requingua Cabernet Sauvignon Toro de Piedra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine score]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewinebloggers.com/?p=690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2003 Vina Requingua Cabernet Sauvignon Toro de Piedra (Chile, Central Valley, Curico Valley) Boysenberry, black currant and cinnamon with red pepper on the nose.  Not much fruit on the palate.  This wine was more of an earthy dark wine.  It has some good characteristics but not my style.  The mid palate and the finish were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/vina-requingua-cabernet-sauvignon-toro-de-piedra-2003-86-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Luigi Chianti 2005, 89 points</title>
		<link>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/san-luigi-chianti-2005-89-points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/san-luigi-chianti-2005-89-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$0-30 wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dry Wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2005 San Luigi Chianti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italy wine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red wine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine score]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewinebloggers.com/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2005 San Luigi Chianti (Italy, Tuscany, Chianti) Color was purple hinting on the brownish side.  The nose was very floral with lilacs, roses and with hints of red fruit.  Very nice smell to this wine and initially felt serene. The palate was much more floral than I expected for a Chianti . More floral than fruit. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/san-luigi-chianti-2005-89-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Concannon Vineyard Petite Sirah Limited Release 2004, 85 points</title>
		<link>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/concannon-vineyard-petite-sirah-limited-release-2004-85-points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/concannon-vineyard-petite-sirah-limited-release-2004-85-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 01:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$0-30 wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concannon Vineyard Petite Sirah Limited Release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red wine review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine tasting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewinebloggers.com/?p=310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2004 Concannon Vineyard Petite Sirah Limited Release  (USA, California, Central Coast) Color was very deep red/purple.  Can&#8217;t even see through it.  The nose at open had blackberry,  a little cherry and alcohol, and a very unique smell that smells like a perm for hair with some ammonia.  Really strange.  The palate was short that went very [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/concannon-vineyard-petite-sirah-limited-release-2004-85-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McManis Family Vineyards Merlot 2007, 85 points</title>
		<link>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/mcmanis-family-vineyards-merlot-2007-85-points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/mcmanis-family-vineyards-merlot-2007-85-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$0-30 wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McManis Family Vineyards Merlot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merlot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red wine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine tasting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewinebloggers.com/?p=283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McManis Family Vineyards Merlot (USA, California) The color was a thin light purple.  The nose was just ok with darker fruits and tobacco.  The alcohol was very prevalent.  This wine was very short with just a little fruit on the palate, cherry and cedar.  The alcohol and tang hit hard.  Way too much.  Disjointed and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/mcmanis-family-vineyards-merlot-2007-85-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Terlato Vineyards Angels&#8217; Peak 2003, 89 points</title>
		<link>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/terlato-vineyards-angels-peak-2003-89-points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/terlato-vineyards-angels-peak-2003-89-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$30-60 wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red wine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terlato Vineyards Angels' Peak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine score]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewinebloggers.com/?p=253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2003 Terlato Vineyards Angels&#8217; Peak (USA, California, Napa Valley) Quality wine. Smooth and had good balance with medium complexity. I think the 2003 will round out in a few more years. The color was a dark purple.  The nose was more like a merlot with some cherry and blueberries.  The palate had a little bang on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/terlato-vineyards-angels-peak-2003-89-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palazzo 2005, 90 points</title>
		<link>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/palazzo-2005/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/palazzo-2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$30-60 wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palazzo red wine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red wine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine score]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewinebloggers.com/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2005 Palazzo (USA, California, Napa Valley) The best part of this wine is the nose.  Very complex dark fruits with oak and floral.  It was enjoyable sniffing and it lasted. Color was a medium purple.  The palate was good but not outstanding.  It is a solid wine though.  Dark fruits loads of oak which was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/palazzo-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quintessa 2005, 90 points</title>
		<link>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/quintessa-2005-90-points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/quintessa-2005-90-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[$100-150 wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Wines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quintessa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine score]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewinebloggers.com/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2005 Quintessa (USA, California, Napa Valley, Rutherford) Really solid wine every time I have it.  Has an old world feel that I really like. I like the 04 a little better than the 05 just because the 04 was a touch smoother. Dark purple on the color with brown around the fringes. Vanilla and plum on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewinebloggers.com/quintessa-2005-90-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

